<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Barely Legally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barelylegally.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barelylegally.com</link>
	<description>confessions of a moot court bailiff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:03:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lights! Camera! Transaction! by Dominic</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/lights-camera-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=797#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scott, if you read my post, you&#039;d see that Ms. Storey is most likely trying to deduct various filmmaking expenses from the gross income she makes &lt;b&gt;as an attorney&lt;/b&gt;. This is likely not a situation where some struggling filmmaker is drowning in taxes; Ms. Storey is a lawyer trying to avoid paying taxes by claiming she lost tons of money on her filmmaking. And again, she can still deduct the losses from her filmmaking hobby, but only to offset the gains from her hobby.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for the bits about a flat tax and a fair tax, yes, the Internal Revenue Code is overly complex. I&#039;m not sure why that means we need to replace our regime with something regressive or &quot;fair.&quot; Besides, the rule about hobby losses is the opposite of overly complex. It&#039;s very simple and straightforward.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://openjurist.org/665/f2d/1292/dreicer-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a case about a fellow named Dreicer&lt;/a&gt; who traveled the world, dining at the best restaurants and lounging in the best hotels on each continent. He tried to claim these were business expenses because he published a single book about his travels. This was properly deemed a hobby, because Dreicer wasn&#039;t honestly engaged in a profit-seeking venture. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And Dreicer wasn&#039;t some poor bloke following his dream. He was a trust-fund baby trying to write off (in today&#039;s money) hundreds of thousands of dollars in income from his family trust. He liked fancy food and wanted the American taxpayer to foot the bill instead of paying his fair share of taxes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know about Lee Storey, but the fact that she&#039;s a lawyer by day who happens to lose money on some films doesn&#039;t sound like a struggling filmmaker to me. It sounds like someone with an expensive hobby from which she can already deduct &lt;b&gt;some&lt;/b&gt; (not all) of her expenses.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, if you read my post, you&#8217;d see that Ms. Storey is most likely trying to deduct various filmmaking expenses from the gross income she makes <b>as an attorney</b>. This is likely not a situation where some struggling filmmaker is drowning in taxes; Ms. Storey is a lawyer trying to avoid paying taxes by claiming she lost tons of money on her filmmaking. And again, she can still deduct the losses from her filmmaking hobby, but only to offset the gains from her hobby.</p>

<p>As for the bits about a flat tax and a fair tax, yes, the Internal Revenue Code is overly complex. I&#8217;m not sure why that means we need to replace our regime with something regressive or &#8220;fair.&#8221; Besides, the rule about hobby losses is the opposite of overly complex. It&#8217;s very simple and straightforward.</p>

<p>There&#8217;s <a href="http://openjurist.org/665/f2d/1292/dreicer-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue" rel="nofollow">a case about a fellow named Dreicer</a> who traveled the world, dining at the best restaurants and lounging in the best hotels on each continent. He tried to claim these were business expenses because he published a single book about his travels. This was properly deemed a hobby, because Dreicer wasn&#8217;t honestly engaged in a profit-seeking venture. </p>

<p>And Dreicer wasn&#8217;t some poor bloke following his dream. He was a trust-fund baby trying to write off (in today&#8217;s money) hundreds of thousands of dollars in income from his family trust. He liked fancy food and wanted the American taxpayer to foot the bill instead of paying his fair share of taxes.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t know about Lee Storey, but the fact that she&#8217;s a lawyer by day who happens to lose money on some films doesn&#8217;t sound like a struggling filmmaker to me. It sounds like someone with an expensive hobby from which she can already deduct <b>some</b> (not all) of her expenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lights! Camera! Transaction! by Scott Greene</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/lights-camera-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=797#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just read about Filmmaker Lee Storey&#039;s Income Tax battle.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So all the woman wants is to make films.  But instead she ends up spending countless amounts of money in addition to endless hours under horrific stress trying to prove that the part time movies she makes are a business and not a hobby.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is an utter and  total waste of time that only exists because of this country&#039;s current, confusing and mind numbing Income Tax laws.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the Income Tax system used by this country with all of its complexity and contradictions was actually simplified or totally gotten rid of and replaced with any number of other very simple tax systems (Flat tax, Fair tax, etc.), then this woman could have avoided the stressful, expensive and time consuming tax audits that she has endured.    &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To pour your life savings into films that do not make you a profit (you actually lose money) and then come to find out that the government auditors claim you owe them thousands if not hundreds of thousands of dollars on top of your losses, not to mention the legal fees you now have to pay to defend yourself, well this is not a tax system that can sustain itself too much longer.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The solution to all this does not lie in continuing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars battling the Income Tax code, but instead the solution lies in simplifying the tax code system itself.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read about Filmmaker Lee Storey&#8217;s Income Tax battle.  </p>

<p>So all the woman wants is to make films.  But instead she ends up spending countless amounts of money in addition to endless hours under horrific stress trying to prove that the part time movies she makes are a business and not a hobby.  </p>

<p>This is an utter and  total waste of time that only exists because of this country&#8217;s current, confusing and mind numbing Income Tax laws.  </p>

<p>If the Income Tax system used by this country with all of its complexity and contradictions was actually simplified or totally gotten rid of and replaced with any number of other very simple tax systems (Flat tax, Fair tax, etc.), then this woman could have avoided the stressful, expensive and time consuming tax audits that she has endured.    </p>

<p>To pour your life savings into films that do not make you a profit (you actually lose money) and then come to find out that the government auditors claim you owe them thousands if not hundreds of thousands of dollars on top of your losses, not to mention the legal fees you now have to pay to defend yourself, well this is not a tax system that can sustain itself too much longer.  </p>

<p>The solution to all this does not lie in continuing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars battling the Income Tax code, but instead the solution lies in simplifying the tax code system itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 28 Days Laterer by New Media and Toiletries &#171; Barely Legally</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/28-days-laterer/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>New Media and Toiletries &#171; Barely Legally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1147#comment-845</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] for movies, well, they&#8217;re on Netflix&#8230; eventually. Seriously, if you can&#8217;t even sell stolen DVDs, I wonder why Hollywood thinks you can still [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for movies, well, they&#8217;re on Netflix&#8230; eventually. Seriously, if you can&#8217;t even sell stolen DVDs, I wonder why Hollywood thinks you can still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pirate Sentenced to Year in Prison by chrole</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/pirate-sentenced-to-year-in-prison/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>chrole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1122#comment-678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Worth sitting through for that one scene. Uh huh. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, it&#039;s snowing on my phone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth sitting through for that one scene. Uh huh. </p>

<p>Also, it&#8217;s snowing on my phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just a Friendly Game by Darren Shield</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/just-a-friendly-game/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Shield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1111#comment-622</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought i was the only one who put down consortium=sexytimes in my first year tort notes!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought i was the only one who put down consortium=sexytimes in my first year tort notes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Have Blog, Will Trouble by More on Crystal Cox &#171; Barely Legally</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/have-blog-will-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>More on Crystal Cox &#171; Barely Legally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1071#comment-573</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] course, this news doesn&#8217;t really change what I wrote about defamation and such yesterday, but it does shed a little more light on the beef between these [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, this news doesn&#8217;t really change what I wrote about defamation and such yesterday, but it does shed a little more light on the beef between these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hulu&#8217;s Face Match by Fake Mark Zuckerberg</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/hulus-face-match/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Mark Zuckerberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1094#comment-565</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hulu&#8217;s Face Match by James Grimmelmann</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/hulus-face-match/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>James Grimmelmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1094#comment-564</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I believe we call this the distinction between &quot;private&quot; and &quot;public.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe we call this the distinction between &#8220;private&#8221; and &#8220;public.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Professor Says Hearsay Is Pretty Simple by Have Blog, Will Trouble &#171; Barely Legally</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/my-professor-says-hearsay-is-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Have Blog, Will Trouble &#171; Barely Legally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almostlegally.com/?p=76#comment-563</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] course, telling a judge what some other guy told you is usually hearsay. Cox has to get the source into court herself – but she wants to protect her source. So, the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, telling a judge what some other guy told you is usually hearsay. Cox has to get the source into court herself – but she wants to protect her source. So, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No New Record is Good News by Have Blog, Will Trouble &#171; Barely Legally</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/no-new-record-is-good-news/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Have Blog, Will Trouble &#171; Barely Legally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=920#comment-562</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] million dollar lawsuit, I can&#8217;t imagine not getting a lawyer. I hear there are a lot of us looking for work – you could probably get a really good deal on low-cost [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] million dollar lawsuit, I can&#8217;t imagine not getting a lawyer. I hear there are a lot of us looking for work – you could probably get a really good deal on low-cost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 360/372 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: barelylegally.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: barelylegally.com @ 2012-05-19 21:39:10 -->
