<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Barely Legally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barelylegally.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barelylegally.com</link>
	<description>confessions of a moot court bailiff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BWAAAAM BWAAAAAAM BWAAAAAM by Darren</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/bwaaaam-bwaaaaaam-bwaaaaam/comment-page-1/#comment-2572</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1431#comment-2572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It hacks through your computer when it&#039;s asleep? To implant an idea?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;can&#039;t the inception people sue for trademark for their movie?&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It hacks through your computer when it&#8217;s asleep? To implant an idea?</p>

<p>can&#8217;t the inception people sue for trademark for their movie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Old News in re: Zappos Shoes by Zappos&#8217; Terms of Service Held to be Invalid &#124; BLIP Clinic</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/old-news-re-zappos-shoes/comment-page-1/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>Zappos&#8217; Terms of Service Held to be Invalid &#124; BLIP Clinic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 03:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1385#comment-2177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Up:] Barely Legally points out that BI&#8217;s claim that every website on the planet is in jeopardy as a result of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Up:] Barely Legally points out that BI&#8217;s claim that every website on the planet is in jeopardy as a result of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make a Science Check by Dominic</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/make-a-science-check/comment-page-1/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1379#comment-1834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;And thank you for your service to legitimizing D&amp;D as a scientific resource, sir. We are in your debt for 2d6 gratitude points.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And thank you for your service to legitimizing D&amp;D as a scientific resource, sir. We are in your debt for 2d6 gratitude points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make a Science Check by julian</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/make-a-science-check/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1379#comment-1822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the support&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The monster manual is my bible&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the support</p>

<p>The monster manual is my bible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Awkward by leave no evidence</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/awkward/comment-page-1/#comment-1811</link>
		<dc:creator>leave no evidence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1361#comment-1811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Nice imagery on the theater. 
&quot;FIRE&quot;
...
&quot;BTW would you like to read about how terrible I am as a boyfriend?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice imagery on the theater. 
&#8220;FIRE&#8221;
&#8230;
&#8220;BTW would you like to read about how terrible I am as a boyfriend?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lights! Camera! Transaction! by Dominic</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/lights-camera-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=797#comment-1250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Scott, if you read my post, you&#039;d see that Ms. Storey is most likely trying to deduct various filmmaking expenses from the gross income she makes &lt;b&gt;as an attorney&lt;/b&gt;. This is likely not a situation where some struggling filmmaker is drowning in taxes; Ms. Storey is a lawyer trying to avoid paying taxes by claiming she lost tons of money on her filmmaking. And again, she can still deduct the losses from her filmmaking hobby, but only to offset the gains from her hobby.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for the bits about a flat tax and a fair tax, yes, the Internal Revenue Code is overly complex. I&#039;m not sure why that means we need to replace our regime with something regressive or &quot;fair.&quot; Besides, the rule about hobby losses is the opposite of overly complex. It&#039;s very simple and straightforward.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://openjurist.org/665/f2d/1292/dreicer-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a case about a fellow named Dreicer&lt;/a&gt; who traveled the world, dining at the best restaurants and lounging in the best hotels on each continent. He tried to claim these were business expenses because he published a single book about his travels. This was properly deemed a hobby, because Dreicer wasn&#039;t honestly engaged in a profit-seeking venture. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And Dreicer wasn&#039;t some poor bloke following his dream. He was a trust-fund baby trying to write off (in today&#039;s money) hundreds of thousands of dollars in income from his family trust. He liked fancy food and wanted the American taxpayer to foot the bill instead of paying his fair share of taxes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know about Lee Storey, but the fact that she&#039;s a lawyer by day who happens to lose money on some films doesn&#039;t sound like a struggling filmmaker to me. It sounds like someone with an expensive hobby from which she can already deduct &lt;b&gt;some&lt;/b&gt; (not all) of her expenses.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, if you read my post, you&#8217;d see that Ms. Storey is most likely trying to deduct various filmmaking expenses from the gross income she makes <b>as an attorney</b>. This is likely not a situation where some struggling filmmaker is drowning in taxes; Ms. Storey is a lawyer trying to avoid paying taxes by claiming she lost tons of money on her filmmaking. And again, she can still deduct the losses from her filmmaking hobby, but only to offset the gains from her hobby.</p>

<p>As for the bits about a flat tax and a fair tax, yes, the Internal Revenue Code is overly complex. I&#8217;m not sure why that means we need to replace our regime with something regressive or &#8220;fair.&#8221; Besides, the rule about hobby losses is the opposite of overly complex. It&#8217;s very simple and straightforward.</p>

<p>There&#8217;s <a href="http://openjurist.org/665/f2d/1292/dreicer-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue" rel="nofollow">a case about a fellow named Dreicer</a> who traveled the world, dining at the best restaurants and lounging in the best hotels on each continent. He tried to claim these were business expenses because he published a single book about his travels. This was properly deemed a hobby, because Dreicer wasn&#8217;t honestly engaged in a profit-seeking venture. </p>

<p>And Dreicer wasn&#8217;t some poor bloke following his dream. He was a trust-fund baby trying to write off (in today&#8217;s money) hundreds of thousands of dollars in income from his family trust. He liked fancy food and wanted the American taxpayer to foot the bill instead of paying his fair share of taxes.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t know about Lee Storey, but the fact that she&#8217;s a lawyer by day who happens to lose money on some films doesn&#8217;t sound like a struggling filmmaker to me. It sounds like someone with an expensive hobby from which she can already deduct <b>some</b> (not all) of her expenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lights! Camera! Transaction! by Scott Greene</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/lights-camera-transaction/comment-page-1/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=797#comment-1246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I just read about Filmmaker Lee Storey&#039;s Income Tax battle.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So all the woman wants is to make films.  But instead she ends up spending countless amounts of money in addition to endless hours under horrific stress trying to prove that the part time movies she makes are a business and not a hobby.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is an utter and  total waste of time that only exists because of this country&#039;s current, confusing and mind numbing Income Tax laws.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the Income Tax system used by this country with all of its complexity and contradictions was actually simplified or totally gotten rid of and replaced with any number of other very simple tax systems (Flat tax, Fair tax, etc.), then this woman could have avoided the stressful, expensive and time consuming tax audits that she has endured.    &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To pour your life savings into films that do not make you a profit (you actually lose money) and then come to find out that the government auditors claim you owe them thousands if not hundreds of thousands of dollars on top of your losses, not to mention the legal fees you now have to pay to defend yourself, well this is not a tax system that can sustain itself too much longer.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The solution to all this does not lie in continuing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars battling the Income Tax code, but instead the solution lies in simplifying the tax code system itself.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read about Filmmaker Lee Storey&#8217;s Income Tax battle.  </p>

<p>So all the woman wants is to make films.  But instead she ends up spending countless amounts of money in addition to endless hours under horrific stress trying to prove that the part time movies she makes are a business and not a hobby.  </p>

<p>This is an utter and  total waste of time that only exists because of this country&#8217;s current, confusing and mind numbing Income Tax laws.  </p>

<p>If the Income Tax system used by this country with all of its complexity and contradictions was actually simplified or totally gotten rid of and replaced with any number of other very simple tax systems (Flat tax, Fair tax, etc.), then this woman could have avoided the stressful, expensive and time consuming tax audits that she has endured.    </p>

<p>To pour your life savings into films that do not make you a profit (you actually lose money) and then come to find out that the government auditors claim you owe them thousands if not hundreds of thousands of dollars on top of your losses, not to mention the legal fees you now have to pay to defend yourself, well this is not a tax system that can sustain itself too much longer.  </p>

<p>The solution to all this does not lie in continuing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars battling the Income Tax code, but instead the solution lies in simplifying the tax code system itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 28 Days Laterer by New Media and Toiletries &#171; Barely Legally</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/28-days-laterer/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>New Media and Toiletries &#171; Barely Legally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1147#comment-845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] for movies, well, they&#8217;re on Netflix&#8230; eventually. Seriously, if you can&#8217;t even sell stolen DVDs, I wonder why Hollywood thinks you can still [...]&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for movies, well, they&#8217;re on Netflix&#8230; eventually. Seriously, if you can&#8217;t even sell stolen DVDs, I wonder why Hollywood thinks you can still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pirate Sentenced to Year in Prison by chrole</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/pirate-sentenced-to-year-in-prison/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>chrole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1122#comment-678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Worth sitting through for that one scene. Uh huh. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, it&#039;s snowing on my phone.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth sitting through for that one scene. Uh huh. </p>

<p>Also, it&#8217;s snowing on my phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just a Friendly Game by Darren Shield</title>
		<link>http://barelylegally.com/post/just-a-friendly-game/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Shield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1111#comment-622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I thought i was the only one who put down consortium=sexytimes in my first year tort notes!&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought i was the only one who put down consortium=sexytimes in my first year tort notes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
